To order raw e-government data, visit http://www.InsidePolitics.org/egovtdata.html

 

Global E-Government, 2004

 

by Darrell M. West

67 George St.

Center for Public Policy

Brown University

Providence, Rhode Island 02912-1977

United States

Darrell_West@brown.edu

(401) 863-1163

www.InsidePolitics.org

 

September, 2004


Table of Contents

 

Executive Summary 

A Note on Methodology 

Online Information 

Electronic Services 

Privacy and Security 

Disability Access 

Foreign Language Access 

Ads, User Fees, and Premium Fees 

Public Outreach 

Top E-Government Countries 

Differences by Region of World 

Conclusion 

Appendix 

Table A-1  E-Government Rankings by Country, 2004

Table A-2  E-Government Country Ratings, 2003 and 2004

Table A-3  Individual Country Profiles for Services, Privacy, Security, and Disability Access, 2004

Table A-4  Individual Country Profiles for Foreign Language Translation, and Ads, 2004

Table A-5  Best Practices of Top Government Sites, 2004


Executive Summary

 

Electronic government refers to public sector use of the Internet and other digital devices to deliver services and information.  Although personal computers have been around for several decades, recent advances in networking, video imaging, and graphics interfacing have allowed governments to develop websites that contain a variety of online materials.  As discussed in my forthcoming book, Digital Government:  Technology and Public Sector Performance (Princeton University Press, 2005), electronic government is supplanting traditional means of access based on personal visits, phone calls, and mail delivery.

Governments around the world have created websites that facilitate tourism, citizen complaints, and business investment.  Tourists can book hotels through the government websites of many Caribbean and Pacific island countries.  In Australia, citizens can register government complaints through agency websites.  Nations such as Bulgaria, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic are attracting overseas investors through their websites.

            In this report, I present the fourth annual update on global e-government.  I study what is online globally and how electronic government has changed over the past four years.  Using a detailed analysis of 1,935 government websites in 198 different nations undertaken during Summer, 2004, I chart the variations that exist across regions and countries, and discuss the pace at which e-government is unfolding around the world. 

In looking at electronic government from 2001 to 2004, I find that progress is being made, albeit at an incremental pace.  Governments are showing steady progress on several important dimensions, but not major leaps forward.   On several key indicators, e-government performance is edging up.  However, movement forward has not been more extensive in some areas because budget, bureaucratic, and institutional forces have limited the extent to which the public sector has incorporated technology into their mission. 

Among the significant findings of the research are:

1) 21  percent of government websites offer services that are fully executable online, up from 16 percent in 2003, 12 percent in 2002, and eight percent in 2001.

2) 89 percent of websites this year provide access to publications and 62 percent have links to databases.

3) 14 percent (up from 12  percent in 2003) show privacy policies, while 8 percent  have security policies (up from 6 percent in 2003). 

4) 14 percent of government websites have some form of disability access, meaning access for persons with disabilities, the same as in 2003. 

5) Countries vary enormously in their overall e-government performance based on our analysis.  The most highly ranked nations include Taiwan, Singapore, United States, Canada, Monaco, China, Australia, Togo, and Germany.

6) There are major differences in e-government performance based on region of the world.  In general, countries in North America score the highest, followed by Asia, Western Europe, Pacific Ocean Islands, Middle East, Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia, South America, Central America, and Africa. 

 

A Note on Methodology

 

The data for our analysis consist of an assessment of 1,935 national government websites for the 198 nations around the world (see Appendix for the full list of countries). We analyze a range of sites within each country to get a full sense of what is available in particular nations.  Among the sites analyzed are those of executive offices (such as a president, prime minister, ruler, party leader, or royalty), legislative offices (such as Congress, Parliament, or People's Assemblies), judicial offices (such as major national courts), Cabinet offices, and major agencies serving crucial functions of government, such as health, human services, taxation, education, interior, economic development, administration, natural resources, foreign affairs, foreign investment, transportation, military, tourism, and business regulation.  Websites for subnational units, obscure boards and commissions, local government, regional units, and municipal offices are not included in this study. The analysis was undertaken during June and July, 2004 at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. Tabulation for this project was completed by Ruth Brown, Kelly Donnelly, Tolga Erem, Zhizhan Gu, Masha Kirasirova, Ammar Shaikhouni, and Molly Bronson.  National government website addresses can be found at www.InsidePolitics.org/world.html.

The regional breakdowns for the websites we studied are 20 percent from Western European countries, followed by 17 percent from Africa, 14 percent from Asia, 12 percent Eastern Europe, 8 percent the Middle East, 7 percent South America, 5 percent Pacific Ocean countries (meaning those off the Asian continent), 6 percent from Central America, 6 percent North America (which included Canada, the United States, and Mexico), and 5 percent Russia and Central Asia (such as the areas of the former Soviet Union).

Websites are evaluated for the presence of various features dealing with information availability, service delivery, and public access.  Features assessed included the name of the nation, region of the world, and having the following features:  online publications, online database, audio clips, video clips, non-native languages or foreign language translation, commercial advertising, premium fees, user payments, disability access, privacy policy, security features, presence of online services, number of different services, digital signatures, credit card payments, email address, comment form, automatic email updates, website personalization, personal digital assistant (PDA) access, and an English version of the website. 

            Where national government websites are not in English, our research team employed foreign language readers who translate and evaluate national government websites.  In some cases, we have made use of foreign language translation software available online through http://babelfish.altavista.com.  Some of the non-English websites are assessed in part through English translations of portions of the websites. 

 

Online Information

 

In looking at specific features of government websites, we want to see how much material was available that would inform citizens.  Most agencies have made extensive progress at placing information online for public access.  Eighty-nine percent of government websites around the world offer publications that a citizen could access (the same as in 2003 and up from 77 percent in 2002), and 62 percent provided databases (down from 73 percent last year).      

 

Percentage of Websites Offering Publications and Databases

 

2001

2002

 

2003

2004

Phone Contact Info.

70%

77%

--

--

Address Info

67

77

--

--

Links to Other Sites

42

82

--

--

Publications

71

77

89

89

Databases

41

83

73

62

Audio Clips

4

8

8

12

Video Clips

4

15

8

13

 

Most public sector websites do not incorporate audio clips or video clips on their official sites.  Despite the fact that these are becoming much more common features of e-commerce and private sector enterprise, only 12 percent of government websites provide audio clips and 13 percent have video clips.  These are slightly higher than the 8 percent of sites last year that featured audio and video clips. 

 

Electronic Services

 

            For e-government service delivery, we look at the number and type of online services offered. Features are defined as services only if the entire transaction can occur online.  If a citizen has to print out a form and then mail it back to the agency to obtain the service, we do not count that as a service that can be fully executed online.  Searchable databases count as services only if they involved accessing information that result in a specific government service response.

            Of the websites examined around the world, however, 21 percent offer services that are fully executable online, which is up from 16 percent in 2003 and 12 percent in 2002.  Of this group, 11 percent offer one service, four percent have two services, and six percent have three or more services.  Seventy-nine percent have no online services.  

 

Number of Online Services

 

2001

2002

 

2003

2004

None

92%

88%

84%

79%

One

5

7

9

11

Two

1

2

3

4

Three or more

2

3

4

6

 

            North America (including the United States, Canada, and Mexico) is the area offering the highest percentage of online services.  Fifty-three percent (up from 45 percent last year) had fully executable, online services.  This was followed by Pacific Ocean islands (43 percent), Asia (30 percent), Western Europe (29 percent), and the Middle East (19 percent).  Only 2 percent in Russia/Central Asia, 8 percent in Africa, and 8 percent of sites in Eastern Europe offer online government services. 

 

Percentage of Government Sites Offering Online Services by Region of World

 

2001

2002

2003

 

2004

North America

28%

41%

45%

53%

Pacific Ocean Islands

19

14

17

43

Asia

12

26

26

30

Middle East

10

15

24

19

Western Europe

9

10

17

29

Eastern Europe

--

2

6

8

Central America

4

4

9

17

South America

3

7

14

10

Russia/Central Asia

2

1

1

2

Africa

2

2

5

8

 

            As the e-government industry expands worldwide, the complexity and specificity of online services continues to develop.  Many nations have sites devoted specifically to e-government, on which they present new initiatives as well as offer listings of services available online.  For example, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States have highly developed portals, which serve as gateways to a plethora of government services as well as directories to other specific government sites. 

International services have developed in response to the increasing popularity and prevalence of SMS (Short Message Service) via mobile phones.  Many of Norway’s government sites contain explanations of how SMS works and instructions as to how citizens can contact a variety of national agencies by way of their text messaging service.  Sites for the Republic of Congo and Singapore also endorse the use of text-messaging as a means of contacting government officials.   Increased technological development has also allowed many sites to become more disability-friendly.  For example, the Finnish Ministry of the Interior site gives users the option to adjust the size of the font, while some Swedish agencies provide audio versions of the text and information contained on the screen. 

Several sites, such as the British Prime Minister, display links to information about the Bobby program, a disability screening mechanism that serves to verify if a site is properly accessible to disabled citizens.  Other novel services are of a more unique variety.  The Greek Foreign Affairs site gives visitors the option to learn basic Greek online, while the Polish government portal provides a link to a live video feed of Polish storks.  Interestingly, some nations have begun to use the Internet as a means to encourage romance among their citizens.  Moroccan online classified ads contain a special section for personals, while Singapore provides a “love byte” website that gives citizens the opportunity to “find [their] soul mate” online. 

Despite the increased complexity and technological development on many international sites, there remain problems with government sites.  For example the Tanzania portal contains a large number of broken links, while hackers temporarily took over Zambian tourist board site.  Intruders substituted the slogan “Hackers Rule” along with a picture of a penguin on this agency website.  Meanwhile, during the summer of 2004, the Malawi Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation had a link to a section entitled “USAID Food Security Reports” that took visitors to a commercial site showing hard-core pornography.   

One feature that has slowed the development of online services has been an inability to use credit cards and digital signatures on financial transactions.  On commercial sites, it is becoming a more common practice to offer goods and services online for purchase through the use of credit cards.  However, of the government websites analyzed, only 4 percent (up from 2 percent in 2003) accept credit cards and sixth-tenths of 1 percent allowed digital signatures for financial transactions (up from one-tenth of 1 percent last year).   

            Of the 198 nations analyzed, there is wide variance in the number of online services provided by different governments.  The country with the largest number of services is Singapore, with an average of 9.5 services across its various government agencies.  This is followed by Bahrain (5.0 services), China (3.2 services), the Bahamas (3.0 services), the United States (2.9 services), Hong Kong (2.5 services), Australia (2.3 services), and New Zealand (2.1 services).  It is important to keep in mind that our definition of services included only those services that were fully executable online.  If a citizen has to print out a form and mail or take it to a government agency to execute the service, we do not count that as an online service.

 

Privacy and Security

 

            Having visible statements outlining what the site is doing on privacy and security are valuable assets for reassuring a fearful population to make use of e-government services and information.  However, few global e-government sites offer policy statements dealing with these topics.  Only 14 percent (up from 12 percent in 2003) of examined sites have some form of privacy policy on their site, and 8 percent have a visible security policy (up from 6 percent).  Both of these are areas that government officials need to take much more seriously.  Unless ordinary citizens feel safe and secure in their online information and service activities, e-government is not going to grow very rapidly.

 

 

2001

2002

2003

 

2004

Privacy

6%

14%

12%

14%

Security

3

9

6

8

 

            There are widespread variations across the nations in providing privacy policies on their websites.  The countries with the highest percentage of websites offering a visible privacy policy are Malta, the Bahamas, Saint Vincent, Togo, Dominica, and Iraq (each with 100 percent of its sites).  These nations were followed by Australia and Singapore (97 percent), Canada (90 percent), and the United States (82 percent).   

Despite the importance of security in the virtual world, there are wide variations across nations in the percentage of websites showing a security policy.  The countries most likely to show a visible security policy are Iraq (100 percent of its sites), Singapore (93 percent), the United States (67 percent), Taiwan (54 percent), Great Britain (41 percent), China (35 percent), Saint Lucia (25 percent), Belize (25 percent), Germany (23 percent), and Australia (23 percent). 

In order to assess particular aspects of privacy and security, we evaluated the content of these publicly posted statements.  For privacy policies, we look at several features:  whether the privacy statement prohibits commercial marketing of visitor information; use of cookies or individual profiles of visitors; disclosure of personal information without the prior consent of the visitor, or disclosure of visitor information with law enforcement agents.  In general, we found weak protections of visitor privacy.  For example, only 10 percent of government websites prohibit the commercial marketing on visitor information; just six percent prohibit cookies, 10 percent prohibit sharing personal information, and 8 percent share information with law enforcement agents.  And in regard to security policies, 9 percent indicate that they use computer software to monitor traffic. 

 

Disability Access

 

We tested disability access by examining the actual accessibility of government websites through the automated "Bobby 5.0" software produced by Watchfire, Inc. (http://bobby.watchfire.com).  This commercial firm offers software that tests websites against standards of compliance with the standards recommended by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). 

For our test, we used the Priority Level One standard and evaluated each government agency regarding whether it complies with the W3C guidelines.  Sites are judged to be either in compliance or not in compliance based on the results of this test.  According to our Bobby analysis, 14 percent of government websites are accessible to the disabled, the same as last year.  Clearly, more work needs to be undertaken to make government sites accessible to all who wish to use them.

The country whose sites had the largest number of disability error problems, as judged by the Watchfire, Inc. Bobby software, was Togo.  Its sites averaged 231 disability problems per site.  Togo was followed by Saint Lucia (an average of 152 errors), Dominica (87 errors), Somalia (80 errors), Uzbekistan (77 errors), the Republic of Congo (75 errors), China (72 errors), Latvia (72 errors), Russia (65 errors), and Liechtenstein (63 errors).

 

Foreign Language Access

 

Fifty percent of national government websites have foreign language features that allow access to non-native speaking individuals, about the same as the 51 percent last year.  By foreign language feature, we mean any accommodation to the non-native speakers in a particular country, such as text translation into a different language.  Many have no language translation on their site other than their native tongue.  Seventy-seven percent offer at least som